[ SOLVED ] Did anyone figure out how to fix the SETS REDUCED IN SIZE?
-
@vn1ta Hello dear! This happened many times to me as well...i noticed it happens with full screen mode which in that case you have a bigger space to create (but you should not count it as space )and when i choose to move all items together to center them..also about the broken image that happened to me after i edited a published set..the only solution i've found was not going off the border for any reason
but i guess the admins will now find a solution soon! -
@sonia-10 Thank you very much for the response, dear!
Actually, even when I'm in fullscreen mode, I use this square border to limit my work space: https://urstyle.com/shop/9697290 . I always make sure that nothing goes out of the square borders in order to get a full size set. That's the reason why I didn't understand the reduced size of my set 
I too hope that admins will be able to figure out what is causing this issue!
I think that one of the solutions would be to limit working space - since the publishing format is square, the same should be with the working space in the CREATE mode.It would be easier for the software to process it this way and users wouldn't have "lost" or misplaced items in the corners that make their sets smaller. We'd also have to do significantly less cropping and we'd have more freedom when it comes to item placement - the parts that go out of the borders would be cropped out and we'd always have full size sets.
.
.
In any case, we'll see what the admins think.
Best wishes, have a wonderful day!
-
This post is deleted! -
@vn1ta I had the same problem, but I technically solved it. The problem is the item itself. It's hard to explain, but I will try. The item is not the actual size it looks like. Sometimes it's actually in an a white or transparent background which makes it bigger in size. So even if you was to put in the set, the background is actually making it a problem. Most of the time, you would need to cut out parts of it to make it smaller.
-
@emotionaltown Thank you very much for the response, dear!
I'm confused because I've checked all of the items and all of them were inside the square borders. I think that I know what you're talking about - some items (especially uploaded ones) take up more space around them - more than their actual size (like this one on the pic below). But I took care of that, cropped everything carefully... 
The other girls who had the same problem did the same thing and still had the problem
The issue is somewhere within the site code, but it's probably not easy to find it.We'll just have to be patient, it seems...
Have a great day dear! .
-
@vn1ta We are still investigating this issue, but some additional fixes have been just published:
- all new sets will have a solid white background (if you need, you can edit & save old set to convert background from transparent to solid white)
- zoom in/out on mouse scroll has been disabled, there are new 2 icons at create page to zoom in/out the whole content
- some additional small fixes, e.g. for the size of heart icons
-
@admin Thank you so much! We appreciate your efforts! And these are wonderful news! Great job!!
-
@admin said in Did anyone figure out how to fix the SETS REDUCED IN SIZE?::
- all new sets will have a solid white background (if you need, you can edit & save old set to convert background from transparent to solid white)
Oh. Uhm... Can I make the suggestion to make this optional? As there are ways to get a white background into one's set, but (after adding this) no ways to make a background of a set transparent.
-
@myrrael But, dear, .png format for sets makes them appear altered on other sites - e.g. if other sites where we share our work have dark background, our sets will not look good (check the example below)
.
.
I thought that you wanted a solid white background too. May I ask why do you think that transparent background is better? Please let me know
-
@vn1ta If you toss in a white square, it doesn't happen, though.
Here's one such item; https://urstyle.com/shop/9764270I rather have the option of a transparent background then no choice in the matter. And, no, I never actually wanted a solid background. My apologies if I gave that impression.
-
@admin I'm sorry to report another set reduced in size: https://urstyle.com/styles/1569111
I think that the next set might have the same problem. Thank you again for your precious help! P.S. This is how it should look (I downloaded the image and cropped it):
-
The problem with sets reduced in size had been FIXED!
All of Urstyle members who had a problem with smaller sets, please edit your set and save it again in order to fix it!
@auntiehelen @carloadofdogs @NeverlandIsHome @sonia-10 @Emotionaltown
More info about updates can be found in our administrator's post: https://urstyle.com/topic/1635111/8th-june-recent-updates
-
@vn1ta THANK YOU! I actually had messaged the site about the issue a week ago and they did say that it was a glitch they were fixing. So glad it's fixed!!
-
@neverlandishome Urstyle team did everything, I'm just spreading the good news
This made me SOO happy too! -
@myrrael Dear, I am sorry for the late response. I understand your point about adding a background square, but please note that most users will not do that - new users, for example, will just see a problem when they publish their sets on sites with darker background.
I hope that you understand. Admins chose to do this because it is the best solution. Our sets on Polyvore were also always saved with background.
-
@vn1ta Hence why I requested to make it optional. The default setting could be with background.
-
@myrrael I do not decide about that, dear
Urstyle team is trying to provide us with everything we like and want and I'd feel bad if I asked too much from them. Hope you understand. Best wishes!
