[NEWS] ByulBis are calling out Inkigayo for giving Saeyoon unfair screen time
-
While the SaeJaeRose love triangle drama is a guilty pleasure for every K-pop fan every Sunday, ByulBis are pissed with Inkigayo's camera work especially when they don't give Saeyoon the fair screen time she deserves.
Star Beam performed "Flaming Heart" yesterday in Inkigayo and many ByulBis noted that everytime Saeyoon sings her lines and speaks, the camera pans to the other members. Also her fancam was uploaded later than the other members. Because of this unfair treatment. ByulBis & other fandoms trended the #/RespectSaeyoon tag on Twitter to show their grievances towards the unfair treatment.
Some of the tweets are as follows:
OP: While MBF tried their best to give all members the fair share of spotlight they deserve, Inkigayo just did Saeyoon dirty
#/RespectSaeyoon
OP: I know that Saeyoon was criticized few weeks ago for publicly calling out YG Entertainment for giving BlackPink one comeback per year but THIS IS TOO MUCH. SAEYOON HAS BALLS!!!! #/RespectSaeyoon
OP: I'm not a ByulBi but to see a member having an unfair screentime breaks my heart
Star Beam is a talented girl group #/RespectSaeyoon
OP: Actually, Saeyoon & Rose are in good terms lately so no need to bully Saeyoon #/RespectSaeyoon /insert a pic of Saeyoon & Rose hugging together in encore/
OP: I'm a Yujia-stan but imagine one of her unnies being mistreated by a music show?! GIVE SAEYOON THE FAIR SCREENTIME!
#/RespectSaeyoon
OP: LACK OF SCREENTIME WHILE HAVING HER FANCAM LATER THAN THE SEUBIM MEMBERS?! ARE YOU SERIOUS?! #/RespectSaeyoon
OP: I'm a Blink but Star Beam are bunch of talented and nice girls. Saeyoon doesn't deserve this #/RespectSaeyoon
OP: Imagine her male best friend enjoys the privileges as an MC while Saeyoon suffers lack of screentime?! INKIGAYO, BE FAIR!!!! #/RespectSaeyoon
Meanwhile MBF Entertainment is trying to reach out to SBS Inkigayo PD regarding Saeyoon. Star Beam is about to end their "Flaming Heart" promotions this week. What are your thoughts in this issue?
Comments (0)